XLS《学生》

"表(10)本上海大学毕业设计(论文)中期检查考评表" "学生所在学院",,

,"专业",,

"学生姓名",,

"学号",,

"指导教师",,

,"教师号",,

"职称",,

"教师所在学院",,

"论文题目" "考评项目","权重","考评指标","分值","考评要求",,

,,

,"得分" "1.

任务书","25","1.1封面","3","按要求填写完整、准确3分;

缺(错填)一项扣一分,扣完为止",,

,,

, ,,

"1.2课题内容","5","课题内容充实、切题,体现专业培养要求,与生产、科研、社会实际结合度好,难易度适中5分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.3目的要求","5","目的要求明确,所列技术指标与研究目的或设计要求相符、可行,可考核5分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.4进度计划","4","以分段时间为单位填写,进度安排、工作量适中4分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.5文献资料","2","所选文献资料及书籍具参考价值,出处明确、填写规范,篇目3篇及以上(含英文文献)2分;

教材类居多或无英文文献1分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.6审批意见","2","对任务书所填内容有明确的审批意见及亲笔签名2分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.7学生意见","2","有明确表示接受任务的态度及亲笔签名2分;

只有"同意"等简单意见1分",,

,,

, ,,

"1.8课题变动","2","有课题变动情况的填报及亲笔签名2分;

缺(错填)0分",,

,,

, "2.开题报告","25","2.1封面","3","按要求填写完整、准确3分;

缺(错填)一项扣一分,扣完为止",,

,,

, ,,

"2.2立题依据","1","课题立题有依据或研究意义1分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.3现状及趋势","2","现状及趋势分析利于课题研究2分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.4内容与目标","3","课题内容充实、切题,目标明确,研究或设计方案可行3分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.5研究难点","3","明确提出课题研究的理论难题或技术难点3分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.6创新点","2","能在选题、观点、理论或研究方法等方面体现创新点2分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.7进度计划","2","以分段时间为单位填写,进度安排、工作量适中2分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.8文献资料","2","所选文献资料及书籍具参考价值,出处明确、填写规范,篇目3篇及以上(含英文文献)2分;

教材类居多或无英文文献1分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.9教师意见","5","对课题的深度、广度及工作量有明确意见和亲笔签名5分",,

,,

, ,,

"2.10审批意见","2","有明确的审批意见及亲笔签名2分",,

,,

, "3.中期检查表","20","3.1学生填表","5","按要求填全5分;

缺一项扣一分,以此类推",,

,,

, ,,

,"5","有前阶段总结和下阶段计划5分",,

,,

, ,,

"3.2教师填表","5","填全5分;

缺一项扣一分,以此类推",,

,,

, ,,

,"5","指出学生存在的问题,对下阶段的指导有措施5分",,

,,

, "4.论文初稿(文)或阶段性成果(理工)","30(文)","4.1目录","10","能清楚介绍论文章节层次,有条理10分;

目录层次不清5分;

无目录0分",,

,,

, ,,

"4.2论文初稿","20","按任务书要求书写,初稿章节层次有条理、规范,对开题报告中提出的理论难题有阐述,具创新思维20分;

初稿章节层次不清,书写不规范10分;

未按任务书要求,书写不规范0分",,

,,

, ,"30(理工)","4.1课题方案","15","按任务书要求,课题方案及设计思路清晰,有创新点15分;