编辑: 迷音桑 | 2015-02-05 |
McGillicuddy ? Aimee Tang ? Lauren Cataldo ? Julia Gusev ? Nathan I. Shapiro Published online:
8 January
2009 ? SIMI
2009 Erratum to: Intern Emerg Med DOI 10.1007/s11739-008-0153-z Unfortunately, Fig.
1 of the article is mislabeled and con- tains erroneous data. Please ?nd the correct ?gure here. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11739-008-0153-z. D. C. McGillicuddy (&) ? N. I. Shapiro Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Road, WCC-2, Boston, MA 02215, USA e-mail: [email protected] A. Tang ? L. Cataldo Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA J. Gusev Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA ETCO2 and Lactate: Decision Rule Lactate ≥
4 Lactate <
4 ETCO2 <
35 3
53 56 ETCO2 ≥
35 2
39 41
5 92 Sensitivity 73% (95%CI: 56-85%) Specificity 50% (38-62%) ETCO2 and SOFA: Decision Rule SOFA ≥
2 SOFA <
2 ETCO2 <
35 25
31 56 ETCO2 ≥
35 9
32 41
34 63 Sensitivity 73% (95%CI: 56-85%) Specificity 50% (38-62%) Fig.
1 This ?gure represents the operating characteristics for ETCO2 at a threshold of
35 for predicting a lactate C4 mmol/L
123 Intern Emerg Med (2009) 4:95 DOI 10.1007/s11739-008-0221-4