编辑: xiaoshou | 2019-07-15 |
77 37 WT
21528 374
433 P1.113 f
77 37 WT
19376 398
457 P1.114 f
4 38 WT
20625 350
401 P1.115 f
77 37 WT
10316 365
432 P1.116 m
14 34 WT
16286 359
428 P1.117 m
179 42 A20IEC-KO
15964 369
416 P1.118 f
77 37 A20IEC-KO
17595 357
403 P1.119 m
106 37 A20IEC-KO
17617 362
421 P1.120 m
179 42 A20IEC-KO
17332 350
399 P1.121 m
286 40 A20IEC-KO
20879 379
430 P1.122 m
179 42 A20myel-KO
13019 271
306 P1.123 m
14 34 A20myel-KO
14657 334
370 P1.124 f
4 27 A20myel-KO
14547 311
376 P1.125 m
106 37 A20myel-KO
12070 325
365 P1.126 m
106 37 A20myel-KO
12071 275
326 P1.127 m
286 40 A20myel-KO
10992 358
425 P1.128 m
179 42 A20IEC/myel-KO
13237 332
371 P1.129 m
286 40 A20IEC/myel-KO
8105 302
331 P1.130 m
179 42 A20IEC/myel-KO
22499 277
312 P1.131 f
4 38 A20IEC/myel-KO
13806 303
336 P1.132 f
77 37 A20IEC/myel-KO
15205 341
404 P1.133 m
106 37 A20IEC/myel-KO
13399 303
348 Supplementary Table 1. Gut microbiota analysis by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing of cohoused wild-type (WT), A20IECCKO , A20myel-KO and A20IEC/myel-KO mice. Caecal samples ID, donor mouse metadata (gender, age, cage and genotype), number of sequenced reads after quality control (QQ Reads), and microbiota richness indexes: observed number of species after rarefaction (Obs) and estimated richness (Chao1). Genotypes Anosim R stat Anosim p-value Permutations Community distance (Bray-Curtis index) WT vs A20IEC-KO 0.10 0.240
999 WT vs A20myel-KO 0.44 0.013 *
999 WT vs A20IEC/myel-KO 0.55 0.005 **
999 A20myel-KO vs A20 IEC/myel-KO 0.20 0.048 *
999 Community distance accounting bacterial relatedness (weighted UniFrac) WT vs A20IEC-KO -0.02 0.454
999 WT vs A20myel-KO 0.10 0.190
999 WT vs A20IEC/myel-KO 0.28 0.011 *
999 A20myel-KO vs A20 IEC/myel-KO -0.02 0.403
999 * p