PDF《只有尊重版权才会有出路》

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 双语 CHINA REPORT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 社址: 北京市海淀区蓟门桥西土城路6号 邮编:

100088 电邮: cipnews@vip.

sina.com 编辑中心:

82803936 采访中心:

82803956 办公室:

82803009 发行部:

82034385 广告部:

82034358 印刷: 解放军报印刷厂 2014年12月17日 星期三出版 主编: 吴辉副主编: 柳鹏英文审校: 崔卫国 December 17,2014 Published on Wednesday Editor-in-Chief: Wu Hui Deputy Editor-in-chief: Liu Peng English Reviser: Cui Weiguo T he world'

s famous watch-maker Omega recently argues with the OMEIKA trademark which was applied for registration in grinder (hand tools). Dissatisfied with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) under the State Admin- istration for Industry and Commerce'

s ruling, Omega Company filed an ad- ministrative lawsuit to Beijing No.1 Intermediate People'

s Court. The court affirmed the TRAB'

s original adjudication, which maintained the registration of omeika trademark. The trademark in question is NO.6144042 欧美卡OMEIKA trade- mark, which was filed by Guangdong Jinda Hardware Company in July, 2007. The trademark was certified to be used on Class

8 grinder goods. Within the legal time limit, Omega Company filed a dispute application, asking for re- vokedthetrademark,butitwasfailed. It is said that the OMEGA, 欧米茄and 奥米加 were applied and regis- tered by Omega Company in watch and jewelry forging tools, including NO.723799 OMEGA and its figure, No.636659 OMEGA SAPPHETTE, NO.172606 奥米加and No.1162186 欧米茄 trademark. Omega Company held that, the trademark in question and cited trade- mark are similar trademarks on same or similar goods. The OMEIKA trade- mark is similar with OMEGA in sym- bols, sound and implication. The court held that there were large differences between OMEIKA and OMEGA in function, distribution channels and consumption target. Sim- ilarity was not constituted. Besides, compared the OMEGA and 欧米茄trademark with 欧美卡OMEIKA, the difference exists in symbol, the num- ber of letters, sound and visual ef- fects. So the court made the decision above. (by Mao Liguo) 本报讯 拥有百年历史的国际著 名制表企业瑞士欧米茄有限公司 (下称 欧米茄公司) , 不满他人在磨具 (手工 具) 等商品上申请注册 欧美卡 OMEI- KA 商标而提出异议.在中国国家工 商行政管理总局商标评审委员会 (下称 商评委) 裁定被异议商标予以核准注册 后, 欧米茄公司向北京市第一中级人民 法院提起行政诉讼.日前, 法院一审判 决维持了商评委被诉裁定. 被异议商标为第 6144042号 欧美 卡OMEIKA 商标, 由广东金达五金制 品有限公司 (下称广东金达公司) 于2007年 7月提出注册申请, 指定使用在 第8类磨具 (手工具) 等商品上.法定 期限内, 欧米茄公司针对被异议商标 提出异议申请, 但并未获得支持.随后, 欧米茄公司向商评委申请复审. 据了解, 欧米茄公司在钟表及首 饰制造工具等商品上申请注册了多 件 OMEGA 欧米茄 奥米加 商标,其中包括第723799 号 OMEGA 及图 商标、第636659 号 OMEGA SAPPHETTE 商标、 第172606 号 奥 米加 商标、第1162186 号 欧米茄 商标 (下统称引证商标) . 在商评委裁定被异议商标予以 核准注册后, 欧米茄公司向北京市第 一中级人民法院提起行政诉讼. 欧米茄公司诉称, 被异议商标与 引证商标构成使用在相同或类似商 品上的近似商标;

被异议商标中的英 文 OMEIKA 为其显著识别部分, 与其引证商标的显著部分 OMEGA 在字形、 读音、 含义上构成近似, 被异 议商标与引证商标构成使用在相同 或类似商品上的近似商标. 法院经审理认为, 首先, 被异议 商标指定使用的磨具 (手工具) 等商 品与引证商标核定使用的钟表及首 饰制造工具等商品相比,在功能用途、 生产销售渠道、 消费对象等方面 存在较大差异, 二者不属于相同或者 类似商品.其次, 被异议商标 欧美 卡OMEIKA 与引证商标 OMEGA 欧米茄 相比, 在文字构成、 字母数 量、 字母呼叫方式、 整体视觉效果等 方面存在一定差异, 故被异议商标与 引证商标未构成使用在相同或类似 商品上的近似商标.故法院作出上 述判决. (毛立国) R ecently, an innovation develop- ment report on China'

s Inter- net industry (2014)was jointly released by Internet Law Center, Pe- king University Law School and Chi- na Law Association on Science and Technology. The report selected

7 Internet areas including real- time communi- cations, online payment, online game, social network, search engine, network security and cloud comput- ing as analysis objects. In real- time communication areas, as of Novem- ber 20, 2014, the report retrieved 4,

140 Chinese patents. Tencent Com- pany ranked the top with

501 pat- ents, followed by Microsoft, Hua- wei, Shanghai Liangming Technolo- gy and IMB. Among the 3,721 pat- ents in online payment area,

189 and

129 of which were obtained by Hua- wei and ZTE. In terms of online game area, Tencent, Huawei and KONAMI ranked the first three plac- es in patent holding. The number of patent ob- tained by Chinese Internet compa- nies in real- time communications, online payment and other areas has on a par with or exceed such for- eign companies in Chinese market. Chinese Internet company will play a more and more important role in global innovation map in the fu- ture. said Zhang Ping, Executive Vice President of Peking University Intellectual Property Law School. In fact, the report also reveals the difficulties and challenges faced by such companies. According to the report, Chinese Internet companies still need to improve their innovation capability. Some advanced Internet companies should consider invest- ments in cutting- edge technology, and accumulate competition capital through innovation. This facilitates the construction of market order in China'

s Internet industry. Zhang Ping adds. (by Wang Kang) 本报讯 日前, 由北京大学法 学院互联网法律中心和中国科学技 术法学会联合发布的 《中国互联网 技术创新观察报告(2014) 》 (下称《报告》 ) 揭晓了中国互联网企业的 创新状况.有关专家表示, 随着互 联网技术的迅猛发展, 技术的更新 速度加快, 中国互联网企业在大部 分技术领域的专利申请量呈现明显 增长趋势, 互联网企业知识产权意 识不断增强. 数据显示, 《报告》 主要选取即 时通讯、 互联网支付、 网络游戏、 社 交网络、 搜索引擎、 ........