PDF《电话号码：》

电话号码:

3919 3663 传真号码:

25217518 受文者 发文者 档号 日期:

2015 年12 月2日堡-j聋 有关 前盘尼地城焚化炉、层房及刘11:邻用地土地除海工程 所涉及拆卸加多近街临时花园的事宜 当值议员单仲偕议员(召集人)和何俊贤议员,以及应邀 出席的张超雄议员昨天与申诉团体 守护坚城关注组 会唔,取 他们就上述事宜提出的关注和诉求.

2. 简括而言,申诉团体指出,西区休憩用地严重不足,位於 坚尼地城的加多近街临时花园是该区唯一的草地公园,惟政府 当局拟在进行 前坚尼地城焚化炉、屠房及耽邻用地土地除污 工程 时,拆卸该草地公园.鉴於该草地公园别其特色,并非区 内的卑路乍湾公园、科士街游乐场及坚尼地城临时游乐场可 取代,故此,申诉团体反对政府当局拆卸该草地公园,并希望 财务委员会(下称 财委会 )於2015 年12 丹4日举行的会议上考虑 上述工程的财务建议时,否决有关建议,以便可保留该草地 公园. 3. 议员指示公共申诉办事处将申诉团体促请财委会否决 上述财务建议的函件,以及申诉团体所提供的补充资料转致 财委会,以供备悉.现将申诉团体的函件及补充资料随附於后, 以供你转呈财委会委员. 4. 就此方面,遵议员指示,公共申诉办事处己致函要求 政府当局尽快就申诉团体在上述函件和补充资料中所提的关注 和建议作出自应.一俟接获政府当局的回应后,公共申诉办事处 当即将之送交你,以供你转呈财委会委员参阅. 连盟主t 高级议会秘书(申诉及资源管理 )3 行丸之 (余赞琮;

女王) Object demolition of Cadogan Street Garden Make better landuse plan for Kennedy Town 1st December,

2015 Discussion with Legislative Councilors ~1,400 or more residents objecting Government to demolish Cadogan Street Temporary Garden ( Park )

1 ? The Park is scheduled to be demolished in 1st quarter of 2016, with only reason that this site is to make way for residential building development ? ~1,400 residents joined our signature campaign to object demolition of the Pak ? Since this plan has not run through its entire consultation with the public and certainly not yet received approval from Town Planning Board, we regard any demolition work on the Park: ? a despise to the community considering the lack of green space in this area ? a maladministration for following proper town planning and legal procedure ? We strongly request for your help: ? No demolition work should commence until there is an approved Plan ? Persuade Government to conserve the Park ? Not to approve funding for decontamination work unless ways to conserve the Park and decontaminate in more environmental friendly method such as phytoremediation are fully explored <

Hamilton, do you know how to crop the floor plan here? Will send you the PDF floor plan from a DC paper >

2 The problem stems from Kennedy Town West Landuse Plan by Development Bureau that has major deficiencies Landuse plan killing the Park 1. Park is sacrificed for private residential building development 2. Current recreational space per resident is only 0.78sqm (below 2sqm Planning guideline) 3. Commercial buildings on promenade reducing open space and stopping residents to harborfront 4. Insufficient traffic capacity and community facilities to cope with increasing population Government'

s reply is disappointing so far C Development Bureau is the problem 1. Development Bureau wants the Cadogan St. park and its nearby area to be developed so that decontamination needs to be done first 2. They claimed the land has been idle for over