PDF《电话号码：》

s site is too near the dock, it should be prohibited. ? If the Government is not allowed to build residential units on the Park'

s site, do you still have the incentive to demolish the Park and change its current landuse as a recreational space?

9 We seek your help to question the Government structurally re the decision for Cadogan Street Temporary Garden (cont'

d) 2. Land Use development: Why cannot Government to consider alternative Option A or B* mentioned in this document to create a win-win solution, better meet Planning guideline for recreational space (2sqm per resident), and address the traffic congestion/ capacity issue by reducing the # of units to be built? C According to Government'

s Plan 2, it supposes to add additional 3,300 new units on existing 1,200 units on Ka Wai Man Road. It could possibly mean adding

99 double-decker buses or

707 mini-buses**, or even more if people put their private cars on the road. Is it clear that the current Plan

2 does not work and number of units should be significantly reduced to avoid over-development? C Why cannot the Option A or B proposed in this document be considered to meet at least the local Planning guideline which is 1sqm per resident, if 2sqm per resident cannot be met? C Should Government build roads before allowing development of the land? ? Road works required for widening of Victoria Road first ? Road works required for widening/ extensions of Ka Wai Man Road to be done before building to proceed C How can the construction be started without genuine residents'

approval? It is an indication of improper consultation if there is more than 1,200 objections in just one week with number of objections increasing. C Should the Government follow common sense principles for the betterment of the community? ? Building higher further away from sea and current housing units are common sense principle to spread out and avoid over-crowding ? Any residential buildings built near the port is inefficient due to prox........